We Love…

Following a link from our October newsletter, we’ve highlighted some of the best (in our opinion) digital howlers. Ideas, that when given the room and money needed to grow, can lead to some very interesting and entertaining outcomes… from marketeers that should know better…


01 - Second Life… No Life…

2007 brought us the uncontrollable excitement of Second Life’s commercialisation … What crap. Build a virtual storefront and everyone will love you. I hope, come the recession, that the marketeers who suggested such rubbish are the first to be shot at dawn.

A second ‘rate’ idea that cost not only dollars, but a loss of face for the marketing industry as a whole by jumping on this rubbishy bandwagon, making it more difficult to say ‘hey, this is what you should be doing’ with the corporate dollar when the ROI of $100,000 to $5mill spend for a poxy 1000 visits, is and will forever be shameful… woohoo…

I bet the likes of Nike, Nissan, Reebok, Starwoods, et al are kicking themselves and wishing that they invested in some good old fashioned engagement which would show a better return of say 1000%

Overhyped rubbish… yes it was.

02 - Meaningless links

These days we all know that to rank well with the Search Engines you need plenty of Inbound Links - what people tend to forget is that any old link just won’t cut the mustard.

Organic links from relevant, quality pages are what you’re after, following basic rules such as:

i) make sure they’re from pages at least 1 point higher in Page Rank and have content relevant to your site (and if you get the opportunity ask for the inbound links to be from your top keywords, not from words such as ‘click here’)

ii) the pages should have less than 100 total outbound links (inc. internal navigation)

iii) and feature no more than 16 sponsored links or 2 Google Adword boxes.

Anything else will turn you into an online pariah - so don’t leave irrelevant comments on blogs leading back to your monetised homepage and don’t carpet bomb the internet with your link. Let inbound traffic build organically - encourage 2-way communication with other people and become part of the online community as a whole.

(And if you have do have a link page on your site, make sure you don’t call it this - Google does not like these words and if it finds them it’ll negatively impact on your ranking)


03 - Sony’s… All I want for Christmas is a PSP

And the title of worst viral campaign goes to the agency that created the Sony PSP Christmas campaign… After they set up a fake website pretending to be PSP “fanboy’s” and produced a video with a cringe-inducing rap, followed by fake comments praising their campaign. The original posting included “we started clowning with sum not-so-subtle hints to j’s parents that a PSP would be teh perfect gift”. Now I don’t know about you, but I think I just threw up a bit in my mouth… Never ever underestimate your target market’s intelligence . . . NEVER fake a viral!


04 - Cut price websites… Bargain!

When someone offers to design and build you a website for £400 all in, it must be a bargain…
Oh, but it appears to look like all the other site’s out there… AND YOU SEEM SURPRISED! There are far too many people offering templated websites, that neither fulfill the clients needs or offer you any sort of advantage over your competitors.

Now I understand that clients often have to work within a budget, but there’s really no benefit to using these cowboy’s because people will NEVER be able to find your website unless you GIVE them the URL… So they have no SEO properties what so ever.

Not only that, but these sites only ever use one template, have no thought behind target market, tone of voice or market positioning - they’re badly built, badly managed and they provide no positive comeback whatsoever - so our advice is you may as well go and burn your money instead…


05 - Always check your mailing list…

Earlier this year Virgin Trains accidentally hit the send button before checking their mailing list, inviting thousands of customers to a luxury golf weekend… After which they quickly sent another email apologising, as the offer was only meant for a selected few!

They then gave the thousands of ‘happy to have won’ customers the chance to enter another competition to win back one of three available spaces on the luxury weekend that they had already just won… Confusing or simply embarrassing… Well that will teach you to check your mailing list next time…

A month ago that Google announced it had enhanced its robot’s crawling to index the text embedded within Flash movies (with the help of Adobe). At the time there was cheering, whooping and it even made the BBC website - which made it pure fact.

As the dust settled however, gaps started appearing in the official press release. The announcement was incredibly vague - the basic gist was that something had been changed to make this happen. Developers, it seemed, had to work out what had changed themselves. And it turns out this is exactly the way it was meant to happen. Two main points were particularly mind-boggling, leaving many questions unanswered:

“…if your web page loads a Flash file via JavaScript, Google may not be aware of that Flash file, in which case it will not be indexed.”

Due to Internet Explorer activation action, all websites must use JavaScript to embed their content. Does this mean that they will not be indexed? What would be the point of indexing flash if you can’t view any of them?

“We currently do not attach content from external resources that are loaded by your Flash files…[if your movie] loads an HTML file, an XML file, another SWF file, etc., Google will separately index that resource”

Any self-respecting Flash Developer will be loading their text content dynamically. Again this will make the indexing completely useless for most well developed websites - but if the XML content is indexed separately Google will lead the user to the XML content instead! Beautiful.

Thankfully Google responded in the comments of the original post (why not a new post to clear things up?) and we now know that the external content linking and javascript flash embedding problems are being fixed - but it looks like there’s still going to be a long wait for true indexing of flash content.